Defending cost estimates: As part of the revised business plan, CHSRA estimated the cost of the blended system to be $66 billion.Economists who had looked at the regional impact found that HSR would create 100,000 construction-related jobs in the Central Valley, or roughly three jobs for every lost construction job in the region. Making job impacts more regionally relevant: To support mayors and other business leaders in the Central Valley, Forward Observer showed construction employment in key counties along the proposed HSR corridor had fallen by 38,000 jobs – a 28% drop from late 2008 to the end of 2011.This task was the toughest and most complex infrastructure fight in the United States in 2012.įorward Observer supported the effort in the Legislature by developing a new foundation of arguments and evidence to support the revised HSR business plan. This team was tasked with battling back against critics and securing the final legislative votes to authorize funding for the first phase of the system. The California Alliance for Jobs, an organization of construction trade unions, assembled a high-powered team of media and advocacy professionals, including Forward Observer. ![]() Representative John Mica (R-FL), Chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, said the project was a “disaster” that seemed to be “imploding.” A December 2011 Field Poll showed that 64% of California voters wanted another chance to vote on the 2008 ballot initiative authorizing state bonds for the project.īut key players in Sacramento’s transportation and political circles made a last-ditch effort to save the project and support Governor Jerry Brown’s new team at the California High Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA). On November 2, 2011, the Sacramento Bee reported California’s historic high-speed rail project was “on the brink of collapse.” One California legislator said the project was a “boondoggle that needs to be derailed.” U.S. In these engagements, we provide content that strengthens the factual basis for our client’s position and addresses points raised by other participants in the advocacy process. Content for Government AffairsĬlients and their government affairs teams turn to Forward Observer to provide content for lobbying efforts on complex issues before Congress, state legislatures, regulatory bodies and government agencies nationwide. Steve Maviglio, Spokesman, Californians for Clean Energy and Jobs, No on Prop. Forward Observer's research was a major contributor to our rapid response effort and fueled our earned media effort." "Forward Observer provided the ammunition we needed in the No on Prop 23 campaign against special interests that wanted to repeal California's clean energy and clean air law. Forward Observer identifies and develops the high-impact content clients need to solve complex public affairs challenges. Superior content is the foundation of effective advocacy and strategic communications.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |